Using the concepts from the previous pages,
it is now possible to imagine a different world. But I must
first establish a boundary to improve both of our abilities to
converse and learn. This boundary, I believe, is imperative for
discussing spiritual ideas of any kind and thus I ask for, and try to
give, this respect at all times.
|
Rules for Spiritual discussion:
dealing with competing belief systems
It is my belief that spiritual experiences are completely
personal
and thus no two people can have exactly the same experience nor
can they have the same understanding of a similar experience.
They can try to describe their experiences to each other and they can
decide that the experiences were the same, but because all
perception is filtered through our personal sensesory organs and
then our learned interpretations, there is no way to exactly
verify similarities. Language
is currently the only tool we have to compare spiritual experience,
and it has many drawbacks. This is dramatically different
from scientific discovery where verification of experience with
instrumentation is mandatory. With spiritual experience,
I believe, verification is impossible, and (if we were designed this
way) it is for a very good reason.
(more discussion on science vs.
spirituality)
This calls for a very different style of interaction during
spiritual discussion. During a discussion of scientific
principles, conclusions apply to everyone and thus must be critiqued
by many, but during a discussion of personal spiritual beliefs
conclusions apply only to the individual stating their
beliefs.
The next person, with different beliefs, will likely come to a
different conclusion, which then applies only to their
life. Here, critique only affects the the individual stating
their beliefs, not some large body of spiritual knowledge, and
thus challengers need to understand and have respect for this.
It is still very useful to challenge each other's belief systems,
but note that useful results occur only when one, the
other, or both gain new insight into their own perception of
spirituality. Because truth here is individual, agreement is
of no importance, and arguing is a fools errand.
This brings us to group dynamics. There is quite a bit of
power in groups, which can be used either for good or bad, and
unfortunately the shifting sands of unformed spiritual ideals
are ripe for exploitation. We must keep in mind that since
our spiritual experiences cannot be verified by others, it is
of fundamental importance that each of us decide our
own spiritual truth regardless of what other's think, and
regardless of the strength of their convictions.
No matter what anyone
else says or threatens, we truly are each
inescapably on our very own Spiritual path.
|